[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Studies](https://indike.org/pramana/ins) › [General history and culture](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.general) › [The Dynasties of the Kanarese Districts of the Bombay Presidency from the Earliest Historical Times to the Musalman Conquest](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.general.fleet-1882) › c9.55 # The Dynasties of the Kanarese Districts of the Bombay Presidency from the Earliest Historical Times to the Musalman Conquest c9.55 The Dynasties of the Kanarese Districts of the Bombay Presidency from the Earliest Historical Times to the Musalman Conquest c9.55 - **Language:** English ### [c9.55](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.general.fleet-1882.c9.55) We have four records belonging, or purporting to belong, to the time of Âchugi's eldest son, the \*Mahâmaṇḍalêśvara\* Permâḍi I., whose name appears also as Perma, Pemma, Paramardi, and Hemmaḍi,—three at Narêgal,¹ and one at Koḍikop;² but only the last furnishes a genuine and admissible date,—at the time of the winter solstice, in December, A. D. 1144, of the Raktâkshin \*saṁvatsara\* (Śaka-Saṁvat 1067 current); cited as the seventh year of the Western Châlukya king Perma-Jagadêkamalla II.³ This record expressly describes him as a feudatory of Jagadêkamalla II., and shews that he was consequently called Jagadêkamalla-Permâḍi; and it states that he was ruling the Kisukâḍ seventy, the Bâgaḍage seventy; the Keḷavâḍi three-hundred, and the Nareyaṁgal twelve. The records claim that he vanquished Kuḷaśêkharâṅka, besieged and decapitated Chaṭṭa, pursued a certain Jayakêśin, who must be the second of that name in the family of the Kâḍambas of Goa, and seized the royal power of the Hoysalas; and that he penetrated to the mountain passes of "the marauder Biṭṭiga," \*i.e.\* the Hoysala prince Vishṇuvardhana, besieged his city of Dôrasamudra, pursued him as far as the town of Bêḷâpura, which he took, and followed him, beyond that place, as far as the mountain pass of Vâhaḍi.⁴ His capital, Erambarage, is mentioned in the two records which include the impossible dates of A. D. 949-50 and 950-51. - [Previous: c9.54](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.general.fleet-1882.c9.54) - [Next: c9.56](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.general.fleet-1882.c9.56) - [Up: c9](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.general.fleet-1882.c9) --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/ins.general.fleet-1882.c9.55](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.general.fleet-1882.c9.55) · Pramāṇa