<!-- Pramāṇa, a library of Indian primary sources · https://indike.org/pramana/ins.general.ray-1931.v1.c11.161.2 -->

[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Studies](https://indike.org/pramana/ins) › [General history and culture](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.general) › [The Dynastic History of Northern India (Early Mediaeval Period)](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.general.ray-1931) › v1.c11.161.2

# The Dynastic History of Northern India (Early Mediaeval Period) v1.c11.161.2

The Dynastic History of Northern India (Early Mediaeval Period) v1.c11.161.2

- **Language:** English

### [v1.c11.161.2](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.general.ray-1931.v1.c11.161.2)

It is quite likely, as I have already suggested, that Southern Sind was never thoroughly conquered by the house of Ghazni, and with the first sign of decay in that dynasty, the Sūmras, a local tribe living in the vicinity of Thari, established their supremacy in this region. According to the \*Ta'rīkh-i-Ṭāhirī\* their territory included Alor in the north and their capital was Muḥammad-Tūr, in the Pargana of Dirak identified by Elliot with Shākapur, a populous village about 10 miles south of Mīrpur on the borders of Tharr.'² Another capital of the Sūmras is said to have been Vijeh-kot,³ five miles to the east of the Puran river, above the Allāh-band. But in the \*Ta'rīkh-i-Ma'ṣūmī\*, Thatta is often mentioned as the residence of some of the kings of this dynasty.⁴ According to all the Sind chronicles, the Sūmra chief who founded the dynasty strengthened his position by marrying the daughter of a powerful local Zamindar named Sa‘d. Her son Bhungar appears to have been an active ruler, and died in A. H. 461 (1068 A. D.) after a reign of 15 years. His son Dūdā extended his authority to Naṣrpur, but died in the prime of his manhood in A. H. 485 (1092 A. D.) after a reign of 24 years. His son Singhar was a minor when his father died; but he grew up to be a vigorous ruler ‘and directed his efforts against the country of Kachh, and extended his sway as far as Mānik Bai.'⁵ He died without leaving any son after reigning 15 years.

- [Previous: v1.c11.161.1](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.general.ray-1931.v1.c11.161.1)
- [Next: v1.c11.161.3](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.general.ray-1931.v1.c11.161.3)
- [Up: v1.c11.161](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.general.ray-1931.v1.c11.161)

---
Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/ins.general.ray-1931.v1.c11.161.2](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.general.ray-1931.v1.c11.161.2) · Pramāṇa
