[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Studies](https://indike.org/pramana/ins) › [General history and culture](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.general) › [The Dynastic History of Northern India (Early Mediaeval Period)](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.general.ray-1931) › v1.c17.s2.30 # The Dynastic History of Northern India (Early Mediaeval Period) v1.c17.s2.30 The Dynastic History of Northern India (Early Mediaeval Period) v1.c17.s2.30 - **Language:** English ### [v1.c17.s2.30](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.general.ray-1931.v1.c17.s2.30) ² \*EI\*, Vol. VI, pp. 153-54, Nos. 568, 655, 659-60, 664, 665, 672-73 and 711-14 of Kielhorn's list of Northern Inscriptions in \*EI\*, Vol. V, \*Appendix\*. Kielhorn though not venturing to express any definite opinion on the age of the inscription, remarked that it ‘could hardly be older than the 13th century.’ But I think the date of the grant must be placed sometime before the middle of the 12th century, for there could hardly be any place ‘for a sovereign ruler in the Ganjam area during the reign of Coḍagaṅga (c. 1076-1147 A.D.). In fact it seems likely that either Daṇḍi-mahādevī or her immediate successors were destroyed by that powerful ruler of Kaliṅganagara. - [Previous: v1.c17.s2.29](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.general.ray-1931.v1.c17.s2.29) - [Next: v1.c17.s2.31](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.general.ray-1931.v1.c17.s2.31) - [Up: v1.c17.s2](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.general.ray-1931.v1.c17.s2) --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/ins.general.ray-1931.v1.c17.s2.30](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.general.ray-1931.v1.c17.s2.30) · Pramāṇa