<!-- Pramāṇa, a library of Indian primary sources · https://indike.org/pramana/ins.general.ray-1931.v2.c28.370 -->

[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Studies](https://indike.org/pramana/ins) › [General history and culture](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.general) › [The Dynastic History of Northern India (Early Mediaeval Period)](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.general.ray-1931) › v2.c28.370

# The Dynastic History of Northern India (Early Mediaeval Period) v2.c28.370

The Dynastic History of Northern India (Early Mediaeval Period) v2.c28.370

- **Language:** English

### [v2.c28.370](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.general.ray-1931.v2.c28.370)

⁴ This inscription was first published in 1848, in \*JASB\*, Vol. XVII, Part I, pp 317-20, as an appendix to Maisey's account of the antiquities of Kalinjar. It was then noticed by Cunningham in his \*ASR\*, Vol. XXI. p. 39. It has not yet been properly edited. Kielhorn noticed another Kalinjar inscription from rubbings supplied by Burgess in \*EI\*, Vol. V, \*Appendix\*, p. 35, No. 241. In line 3 it gives the date (\*V.\*) \*Saṁ.\* 1340 (A.D. 1283) ; but unfortunately it does not mention the name of the king. Cunningham noticed another stone-inscription at Ajaigarh, which is dated in 1372 \*V.S.\* (1315 A.D.) in the reign of Vīravarman. As the earliest inscription of the successor of Vīravarman is dated in \*V.S.\* 1345, he assumed the existence of a second king of that name. But it is more likely that there is some mistake in the reading of the date or the name of the king; see \*ASR\*, Vol. XXI, p. 54.

- [Previous: v2.c28.369](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.general.ray-1931.v2.c28.369)
- [Next: v2.c28.371](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.general.ray-1931.v2.c28.371)
- [Up: v2.c28](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.general.ray-1931.v2.c28)

---
Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/ins.general.ray-1931.v2.c28.370](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.general.ray-1931.v2.c28.370) · Pramāṇa
