[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Studies](https://indike.org/pramana/ins) › [General history and culture](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.general) › [The Dynastic History of Northern India (Early Mediaeval Period)](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.general.ray-1931) › v2.c31.100 # The Dynastic History of Northern India (Early Mediaeval Period) v2.c31.100 The Dynastic History of Northern India (Early Mediaeval Period) v2.c31.100 - **Language:** English ### [v2.c31.100](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.general.ray-1931.v2.c31.100) ⁵ \*Ibid\*, pp. 297 and 302, V. 6. Kielhorn at first took Sindhurāja to mean king of Sind, but later on in the ‘\*Errata and Corrigenda\*’ (\*ibid\*, p. 481) said “possibly the king of Sind but more probably Sindhurāja of Mālva.” As Muñja seems to have died some time between 994 and 997 A. D. (\*ibid\*, p. 228), there is no inherent impossibility in Sindhurāja of Mālava being a contemporary of Cāmuṇḍa. But in view of the fact that Mūlarāja also fought with a Sindhurāja I prefer his former view. See also the Arthuna stone inscription of Paramāra Cāmuṇḍarāja (A. D. 1080) where Sindhurāja must be taken to mean ‘prince of Sind.’ See \*EI\*, Vol. XIV. The \*Kumārapāla-carita\* says that Cāmuṇḍa killed Sindhurāja in battle; see I, 31. - [Previous: v2.c31.99](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.general.ray-1931.v2.c31.99) - [Next: v2.c31.101](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.general.ray-1931.v2.c31.101) - [Up: v2.c31](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.general.ray-1931.v2.c31) ## Linked texts (2) - [Epigraphia Indica](https://indike.org/pramana/inp.epigraphy.corpora.ei) - [Kumārapālacarita (Prākṛtadvyāśraya)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.lit.historical.jaina.dvyasraya.kumarapalacarita) — Hemacandra, Prakrit --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/ins.general.ray-1931.v2.c31.100](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.general.ray-1931.v2.c31.100) · Pramāṇa