[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Studies](https://indike.org/pramana/ins) › [Literature, language and dating](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.literature) › [Studies in the History of Sanskrit Poetics](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.literature.de-1923) › v1.c19 # Studies in the History of Sanskrit Poetics v1.c19: Bibliography Studies in the History of Sanskrit Poetics v1.c19 - **Language:** English ## Contents - [v1.c19.s1 Rudraṭa](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.literature.de-1923.v1.c19.s1) — 1 part - [v1.c19.s2 Nami-sādhu](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.literature.de-1923.v1.c19.s2) — 1 part - [v1.c19.s3 Āśādhara](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.literature.de-1923.v1.c19.s3) — 1 part - [v1.c19.s4 Rudrabhaṭṭa](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.literature.de-1923.v1.c19.s4) — 3 parts ### Bibliography ### Rudraṭa ### [v1.c19.s1.1](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.literature.de-1923.v1.c19.s1.1) Edition. Kāvyamālā 2, 1886, with Nami's comm. Our references are to the second edition of this, 1909. MSS. Aufrecht i 103a, ii 20b. ### Nami-sādhu ### [v1.c19.s2.1](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.literature.de-1923.v1.c19.s2.1) Edition. Kāvyamālā 2, 1886, 1909, with the text (see above). MSS. Aufrecht \*ibid.\* ### Āśādhara ### [v1.c19.s3.1](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.literature.de-1923.v1.c19.s3.1) MSS. Aufrecht i 103a, 779a. No MS of Vallabhadeva's commentary on Rudraṭa is known. ### Rudrabhaṭṭa ### [v1.c19.s4.1](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.literature.de-1923.v1.c19.s4.1) Editions. (1) by Pischel with an introd. Kiel 1886 (2) Kāvyamālā pt. iii 1887, 1899. Our references are to Pischel's edition. ### [v1.c19.s4.2](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.literature.de-1923.v1.c19.s4.2) MSS. Aufrecht i 660, ii 158a, 230b, iii 137a ; KBod 491: Madras Cat. 12955. ### [v1.c19.s4.3](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.literature.de-1923.v1.c19.s4.3) Commentary. \*Rasa-taraṅgiṇī\* by Gopāla Bhaṭṭa, son of Harivaṃśa Bhaṭṭa Drāviḍa. See under Commentators on Mammaṭa and Bhānudatta, below. Mentioned in Kāvyamālā ed. of the text (p. 111). He calls his author Rudra. If the Gopāla Bhaṭṭa, cited by Kumārasvāmin, be the same person, then he is earlier than the beginning of the 15th century. As Gopāla Bhaṭṭa appears to be a South Indian writer, this conjecture is probable. Oppert's entry of \*Vana-taraṅgiṇī\* (ii 2711, 1787) on Rudraṭa is apparently a mistake for this work, and the name Rudraṭa is a confusion for Rudra. --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/ins.literature.de-1923.v1.c19](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.literature.de-1923.v1.c19) · Pramāṇa