A History of Sanskrit Literature c21.s6: Chapter VIII

c21.s6.1

*Aitareya Brāhmaṇa*, ed. Aufrecht, Bonn, 1879 (best edition); ed. and trans. by Haug, 2 vols., Bombay, 1863; *Kaushītaki* or *Çāṅkhāyana Brāhmaṇa*, ed. Lindner, Jena, 1887; *Aitareya Āraṇyaka*, ed. R. Mitra, Calcutta, 1876 (*Bibl. Ind.*); *Kaushītaki Āraṇyaka*, unedited; · *Tāṇḍya Mahābrāhmaṇa* or *Pañchaviṃça Brāhmaṇa*, ed. A. Vedāntavāgīça, Calcutta, 1869–74 (*Bibl. Ind.*); *Shaḍviṃça Brāhmaṇa*, ed. J. Vidyāsāgara, 1881; ed. with trans. by Klemm, Gütersloh, 1894; *Sāmavidhāna Brāhmaṇa*, ed. Burnell, London, 1873, trans. by Konow, Halle, 1893; *Vaṃça Brāhmaṇa*, ed. Weber, *Indische Studien*, vol. iv. pp. 371 ff., and by Burnell, Mangalore, 1873. Burnell also edited the *Devatādhyāya Br.*, 1873, the *Ārsheya Br.*, 1876, *Saṃhitā Upanishad Br.*, 1877; *Mantra Br.*, ed. S. Sāmaçramī, Calc., 1890; *Jaiminīya* or *Talavakāra Br.*, ed. in part by Burnell, 1878, and by Oertel, with trans. and notes, in the *Journal of the Am. Or. Soc.*, vol. xvi. pp. 79–260; *Taittirīya Br.*, ed. R. Mitra, 1855–70 (*Bibl. Ind.*), N. Godabole, Ānand. Ser., 1898; *Taittirīya Āraṇyaka*, ed. H. N. Apte, Ānand. Ser, Poona, 1898; *Çatapatha Br.*, ed. Weber, Berlin, London, 1859; trans. by Eggeling in *Sacred Books*, 5 vols.; *Gopatha Br.*, ed. R. Mitra and H. Vidyābhūshaṇa, 1872 (*Bibl. Ind.*), fully described in Bloomfield's *Atharvaveda*, pp. 101–124, in Bühler's *Encyclopædia*, 1899. The most important work on the Upanishads in general is Deussen, *Die Philosophie der Upanishads*, Leipsic, 1899; trans. of several Upanishads by Max Müller, *Sacred Books*, vols. i. and xv.; Deussen, *Sechzig Upanishad's* (trans. with valuable introductions), Leipsic, 1897; a very useful book is Jacob, *A Concordance to the Principal Upanishads and Bhagavadgītā* (Bombay Sanskrit Series), 1891. P. 226: *Thirty-two Upanishads*, ed. with comm. in Ānandāçrama Series, Poona, 1895; *Aitareya Upanishad*, ed. Roer, 1850 (*Bibl. Ind.*), also ed. in Ānandāçrama Series, 1889; *Kaushītaki Brāhmaṇa Upanishad*, ed. Cowell, Calc., 1861 (*Bibl. Ind.*); *Chhāndogya Up.*, ed. with trans. by Böhtlingk, Leipsic, 1889; also in Ānand. Ser., 1890. P. 229: *Kena* or *Talavakāra*, ed. Roer, Calc., 1850; also in Ānand. Ser., 1889; *Maitri Up.*, ed. Cowell, 1870 (*Bibl. Ind.*); *Çvetāçvatara*, ed. Roer, 1850, Ānand. Ser. 1890; *Kāṭhaka Up.*, ed. Roer, 1850, ed. with comm. by Apte, Poona, 1889, by Jacob, 1891; *Taittirīya Up.*, ed. Roer, 1850, Ānand. Ser., 1889; *Bṛihadāraṇyaka Up.*, ed. and trans. by Böhtlingk, Leipzig, 1889, also ed. in Ānand. Ser., 1891; *Īçā Up.*, ed. in Ānand. Ser., 1888; *Muṇḍaka Up.*, ed. Roer, 1850, Apte, Ānand. Ser., 1889, Jacob, 1891; *Praçna Up.*, Ānand. Ser., 1889, Jacob, 1891; *Māṇḍūkya, Up.*, Ānand. Ser., 1890, Jacob, 1891; ed. with Eng. trans. and notes, Bombay, 1895; *Mahānārāyaṇa Up.*, ed. by Jacob, with comm., Bombay Sansk. Ser., 1888; *Nṛisiṃhatāpanīya Up.*, Ānand. Ser., 1895. P. 242: The parallelism of Çankara and Plato is rather overstated; for Plato, on the one hand, did not get rid of Duality, and, on the other, only said that Becoming is not true Being.