[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Studies](https://indike.org/pramana/ins) › [Literature, language and dating](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.literature) › [A History of Indian Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.literature.winternitz-1927) › v2.c19.s6.t3.29 # A History of Indian Literature v2.c19.s6.t3.29 A History of Indian Literature v2.c19.s6.t3.29 - **Language:** English ### [v2.c19.s6.t3.29](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.literature.winternitz-1927.v2.c19.s6.t3.29) ¹ I do not agree with S. \*Lévi\* when (JA 1892, s. 8, t. XIX, p. 202) he calls the Buddha-Carita “un abrégé substantiel du Lalita Vistara.” At least the Lalita-Vistara in its present form cannot have been the model which Aśvaghoṣa used. - [Previous: v2.c19.s6.t3.28](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.literature.winternitz-1927.v2.c19.s6.t3.28) - [Next: v2.c19.s6.t3.30](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.literature.winternitz-1927.v2.c19.s6.t3.30) - [Up: v2.c19.s6.t3](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.literature.winternitz-1927.v2.c19.s6.t3) --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/ins.literature.winternitz-1927.v2.c19.s6.t3.29](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.literature.winternitz-1927.v2.c19.s6.t3.29) · Pramāṇa