[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Studies](https://indike.org/pramana/ins) › [Polity, law and society](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.polity) › [The Mauryan Polity](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.polity.dikshitar-1932) › c5.s2.t2.19 # The Mauryan Polity c5.s2.t2.19 The Mauryan Polity c5.s2.t2.19 - **Language:** English ### [c5.s2.t2.19](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.polity.dikshitar-1932.c5.s2.t2.19) Again the classical style of the ślokas and the metre need not be reckoned as serious arguments. Their evidence is not of much value in determining the date of a piece of composition. Whatever that may be, the apparent non-conformity to Pāṇinīyan rules, the markedly archaic style, and the system of philology which is distinctly Vedic, show that the author of the extant \*Arthaśāstra\* must have been considerably ancient. - [Previous: c5.s2.t2.18](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.polity.dikshitar-1932.c5.s2.t2.18) - [Next: c5.s2.t3.1](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.polity.dikshitar-1932.c5.s2.t3.1) - [Up: c5.s2.t2](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.polity.dikshitar-1932.c5.s2.t2) --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/ins.polity.dikshitar-1932.c5.s2.t2.19](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.polity.dikshitar-1932.c5.s2.t2.19) · Pramāṇa