<!-- Pramāṇa, a library of Indian primary sources · https://indike.org/pramana/ins.polity.heesterman-1985.c19.s10.61 -->

[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Studies](https://indike.org/pramana/ins) › [Polity, law and society](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.polity) › [The Inner Conflict of Tradition: Essays in Indian Ritual, Kingship, and Society](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.polity.heesterman-1985) › c19.s10.61

# The Inner Conflict of Tradition: Essays in Indian Ritual, Kingship, and Society c19.s10.61

The Inner Conflict of Tradition: Essays in Indian Ritual, Kingship, and Society c19.s10.61

- **Language:** English

### [c19.s10.61](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.polity.heesterman-1985.c19.s10.61)

³¹ One is tempted to compare this with Elphinstone's “the Ceded Districts plan of having a Double Dufter,” that is, the appointment of two \*dafterdars\*, record keepers, of equal rank as the chief Indian officials in the district, so that they could be used as a check upon each other. See K. A. Ballhatchet, \*Social\*

- [Previous: c19.s10.60](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.polity.heesterman-1985.c19.s10.60)
- [Next: c19.s10.62](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.polity.heesterman-1985.c19.s10.62)
- [Up: c19.s10](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.polity.heesterman-1985.c19.s10)

---
Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/ins.polity.heesterman-1985.c19.s10.61](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.polity.heesterman-1985.c19.s10.61) · Pramāṇa
