<!-- Pramāṇa, a library of Indian primary sources · https://indike.org/pramana/ins.polity.heesterman-1985.c19.s6.3 -->

[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Studies](https://indike.org/pramana/ins) › [Polity, law and society](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.polity) › [The Inner Conflict of Tradition: Essays in Indian Ritual, Kingship, and Society](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.polity.heesterman-1985) › c19.s6.3

# The Inner Conflict of Tradition: Essays in Indian Ritual, Kingship, and Society c19.s6.3

The Inner Conflict of Tradition: Essays in Indian Ritual, Kingship, and Society c19.s6.3

- **Language:** English

### [c19.s6.3](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.polity.heesterman-1985.c19.s6.3)

³ L. Renou, “La Notion de \*bráhman\*,” \*Journal Asiatique\* 237 (1949): 7ff.; also, “Le Passage des Brāhmaṇa aux Upaniṣad,” \*Journal of the American Oriental Society\* 73 (1953): 138ff. Cf. P. Thieme, “Bráhman,” \*Zeitschrift der Duetschen Morgenlämdischen Gcschichte\* 102 (1952): 91–129. Thieme argues that Renou’s “riddle formulation” is at best an intensified or special meaning of the general “formulation.” (p. 102).

- [Previous: c19.s6.2](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.polity.heesterman-1985.c19.s6.2)
- [Next: c19.s6.4](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.polity.heesterman-1985.c19.s6.4)
- [Up: c19.s6](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.polity.heesterman-1985.c19.s6)

---
Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/ins.polity.heesterman-1985.c19.s6.3](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.polity.heesterman-1985.c19.s6.3) · Pramāṇa
