[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Studies](https://indike.org/pramana/ins) › [Polity, law and society](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.polity) › [The Inner Conflict of Tradition: Essays in Indian Ritual, Kingship, and Society](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.polity.heesterman-1985) › c19.s9.10 # The Inner Conflict of Tradition: Essays in Indian Ritual, Kingship, and Society c19.s9.10 The Inner Conflict of Tradition: Essays in Indian Ritual, Kingship, and Society c19.s9.10 - **Language:** English ### [c19.s9.10](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.polity.heesterman-1985.c19.s9.10) ⁹ Since the \*Manu\* passage is preceded by a reference to the non-kṣatriya king, it might be thought that the following condemnation of the king equally refers to the non-kṣatriya king. Thus, for instance, Robert Lingat, \*Les Sources du droit traditionel de l’Inde\*, (Paris, 1967), 234. However, in other passages, it is the king in general who is condemned. Moreover, his - [Previous: c19.s9.9](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.polity.heesterman-1985.c19.s9.9) - [Next: c19.s9.11](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.polity.heesterman-1985.c19.s9.11) - [Up: c19.s9](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.polity.heesterman-1985.c19.s9) --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/ins.polity.heesterman-1985.c19.s9.10](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.polity.heesterman-1985.c19.s9.10) · Pramāṇa