[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Studies](https://indike.org/pramana/ins) › [Polity, law and society](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.polity) › [Hindu Polity: A Constitutional History of India in Hindu Times](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.polity.jayaswal-1924) › c19.60 # Hindu Polity: A Constitutional History of India in Hindu Times c19.60 Hindu Polity: A Constitutional History of India in Hindu Times c19.60 - **Language:** English ### [c19.60](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.polity.jayaswal-1924.c19.60) § 110. Sometime to escape many "pointless speeches" the right of deliberation on a matter was delegated to an appointed committee who decided the question amongst themselves and then communicated their decision to the Saṃgha. If the committee could not come to a decision, 'the custody of the case,' 'remained in the hands of the Saṃgha' who decided it according to the Procedure-of-Majority. - [Previous: c19.59](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.polity.jayaswal-1924.c19.59) - [Next: c19.61](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.polity.jayaswal-1924.c19.61) - [Up: c19](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.polity.jayaswal-1924.c19) --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/ins.polity.jayaswal-1924.c19.60](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.polity.jayaswal-1924.c19.60) · Pramāṇa