<!-- Pramāṇa, a library of Indian primary sources · https://indike.org/pramana/ins.polity.jayaswal-1924.c29.18 -->

[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Studies](https://indike.org/pramana/ins) › [Polity, law and society](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.polity) › [Hindu Polity: A Constitutional History of India in Hindu Times](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.polity.jayaswal-1924) › c29.18

# Hindu Polity: A Constitutional History of India in Hindu Times c29.18

Hindu Polity: A Constitutional History of India in Hindu Times c29.18

- **Language:** English

### [c29.18](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.polity.jayaswal-1924.c29.18)

§ 188. As to the alleged '\*close resemblance\*' which according to Mr. Smith 'is impossible not to perceive' in the matter of the two criminal procedures, I quote in the footnote¹ the whole passage about the two procedures in Mr. Smith's own words. A mere comparison by both lawyers and laymen would show that it is impossible 'to perceive' the alleged 'resemblance.' I may here refer the reader to the interpretation of the Lichchhavi procedure given above and its comparison with the procedure

- [Previous: c29.17](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.polity.jayaswal-1924.c29.17)
- [Next: c29.19](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.polity.jayaswal-1924.c29.19)
- [Up: c29](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.polity.jayaswal-1924.c29)

---
Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/ins.polity.jayaswal-1924.c29.18](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.polity.jayaswal-1924.c29.18) · Pramāṇa
