<!-- Pramāṇa, a library of Indian primary sources · https://indike.org/pramana/ins.polity.jayaswal-1924.c29.20 -->

[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Studies](https://indike.org/pramana/ins) › [Polity, law and society](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.polity) › [Hindu Polity: A Constitutional History of India in Hindu Times](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.polity.jayaswal-1924) › c29.20

# Hindu Polity: A Constitutional History of India in Hindu Times c29.20

Hindu Polity: A Constitutional History of India in Hindu Times c29.20

- **Language:** English

### [c29.20](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.polity.jayaswal-1924.c29.20)

¹ Turnour, the authority of Mr. Smith on the Lichchhavi procedure, says thus: 'On this point, the \*At-thakathā\* contains this note. "In aforatime, the Wajjian rulers on a person being brought and presented to them, thus charged 'this is a malefactor' without at once deciding 'he is a malefactor,' dispose the Country, that one of the three punishments mentioned in the decision may be approved;

- [Previous: c29.19](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.polity.jayaswal-1924.c29.19)
- [Next: c29.21](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.polity.jayaswal-1924.c29.21)
- [Up: c29](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.polity.jayaswal-1924.c29)

## Cites (1)

- [Aṭṭhakathā (Buddhaghosa)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.theravada_postcanon.manuals.atthakatha) — Buddhaghosa, Pāli

---
Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/ins.polity.jayaswal-1924.c29.20](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.polity.jayaswal-1924.c29.20) · Pramāṇa
