[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Studies](https://indike.org/pramana/ins) › [Polity, law and society](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.polity) › [History of Dharmashastra (Ancient and Mediaeval Religious and Civil Law in India)](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.polity.kane-1930) › v2.c26.97 # History of Dharmashastra (Ancient and Mediaeval Religious and Civil Law in India) v2.c26.97 History of Dharmaśāstra (Ancient and Mediaeval Religious and Civil Law in India) v2.c26.97 - **Language:** English ### [v2.c26.97](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.polity.kane-1930.v2.c26.97) ¹⁰⁶⁸ Vide Bai Laksmi v. Kaliansing 2 Bom. L. R. 128 (marriage between Rajput male and a brāhmaṇa woman held to be invalid); Bai Kashi v. Jamnadas 14 Bom. L. R. 547 (marriage between a brāhmaṇa woman and śūdra male was held to be void); Munnilal v. Shiama I. L. R. 48. All. 670 (marriage between a śūdra male and a vaiśya female held to be invalid). Vide Bai Gulab v. Jivanlal I. L. R. 46 Bom. 871, Natha v. Mehta Chotalal I. L. R. 55 Bom. 1 (marriage of a brāhmaṇa male with a śūdra female was held valid); Nalinaksha v. Rajanikanto 35 C. W. N. 726. Vide Padma Kumari v. Suraj Kumari I. L. R. 28 All. 458. - [Previous: v2.c26.96](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.polity.kane-1930.v2.c26.96) - [Next: v2.c26.98](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.polity.kane-1930.v2.c26.98) - [Up: v2.c26](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.polity.kane-1930.v2.c26) --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/ins.polity.kane-1930.v2.c26.97](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.polity.kane-1930.v2.c26.97) · Pramāṇa