[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Studies](https://indike.org/pramana/ins) › [Polity, law and society](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.polity) › [History of Dharmashastra (Ancient and Mediaeval Religious and Civil Law in India)](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.polity.kane-1930) › v7.c93.342 # History of Dharmashastra (Ancient and Mediaeval Religious and Civil Law in India) v7.c93.342 History of Dharmaśāstra (Ancient and Mediaeval Religious and Civil Law in India) v7.c93.342 - **Language:** English ### [v7.c93.342](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.polity.kane-1930.v7.c93.342) 58. 3) are laudatory of \*yāga\*, by means of a metaphor, that the sense of some words in the mantras like 'Jarbharī turpharītū (Rg. X. 106. 6) or 'Indrah somasya kānukā' (Rg. VIII. 77. 4) about which it is argued that no sense can be made out of them are really explicable with the help of Nirukta (etymology) and grammar, that some words like 'Kīkaṭa', 'Naicāśākha', and 'Pramaganda', that are claimed to refer to a country, a city, a king and therefore are claimed to make the mantra (Rg. III. 53. 14) non-eternal, can be explained in a different way. In this way, no part of the Veda is anarthaka (without sense or useless) or non eternal. The Mīmāṁsakas are very keen on avoiding \*ānarthakya\* of any Vedic words or sentences. - [Previous: v7.c93.341](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.polity.kane-1930.v7.c93.341) - [Next: v7.c93.343](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.polity.kane-1930.v7.c93.343) - [Up: v7.c93](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.polity.kane-1930.v7.c93) ## Cites (1) - [Ṛgvedasaṃhitā](https://indike.org/pramana/in.veda.samhita.rg.10.106.6) — Sanskrit --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/ins.polity.kane-1930.v7.c93.342](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.polity.kane-1930.v7.c93.342) · Pramāṇa