<!-- Pramāṇa, a library of Indian primary sources · https://indike.org/pramana/ins.polity.kane-1930.v7.c93.41 -->

[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Studies](https://indike.org/pramana/ins) › [Polity, law and society](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.polity) › [History of Dharmashastra (Ancient and Mediaeval Religious and Civil Law in India)](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.polity.kane-1930) › v7.c93.41

# History of Dharmashastra (Ancient and Mediaeval Religious and Civil Law in India) v7.c93.41

History of Dharmaśāstra (Ancient and Mediaeval Religious and Civil Law in India) v7.c93.41

- **Language:** English

### [v7.c93.41](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.polity.kane-1930.v7.c93.41)

Even Prof. Sastry admits that in four out of the five references where Jaimini is expressly named, his views are the siddhānta views. The cases of \*PMS\* IX. 2. 3 and \*XII.\* 1. 59 are somewhat remarkable. The adhikarana in both cases consists of only one sūtra, which is the siddhānta view and Jaimini is expressly named therein In \*PMS\* III 1. 4 Jaimini differs from Bādari (III. 1. 3) and two more sūtras are added to complete the adhikarana. In \*PMS\* VIII. 3. 7 Jaimini's view is opposed to that of Bādari (VIII. 3. 6), is the siddhānta view and there is no separate sūtra setting forth the view of the author of the PMS.

- [Previous: v7.c93.40](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.polity.kane-1930.v7.c93.40)
- [Next: v7.c93.42](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.polity.kane-1930.v7.c93.42)
- [Up: v7.c93](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.polity.kane-1930.v7.c93)

## Cites (1)

- [Mīmāṃsāsūtra](https://indike.org/pramana/in.darsana.mimamsa.mimamsasutra.3.1.3) — Jaimini, Sanskrit

---
Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/ins.polity.kane-1930.v7.c93.41](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.polity.kane-1930.v7.c93.41) · Pramāṇa
