[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Studies](https://indike.org/pramana/ins) › [Reference works](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.reference) › [An Encyclopaedia of Indian Archaeology](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.reference.ghosh-1989) › v1.c10.s2.3 # An Encyclopaedia of Indian Archaeology v1.c10.s2.3 An Encyclopaedia of Indian Archaeology v1.c10.s2.3 - **Language:** English ### [v1.c10.s2.3](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.reference.ghosh-1989.v1.c10.s2.3) Athavale, 1960, carried out such work on 30 Indian archaeological samples ranging from 350 to 4200 B.P. His data showed a considerable scatter and no marked secular variation could be detected. But he found that the field intensity was 15% smaller in the past. His data did not prove definitive enough for use in any archaeomagnetic dating in India. - [Previous: v1.c10.s2.2](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.reference.ghosh-1989.v1.c10.s2.2) - [Next: v1.c10.s2.4](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.reference.ghosh-1989.v1.c10.s2.4) - [Up: v1.c10.s2](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.reference.ghosh-1989.v1.c10.s2) --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/ins.reference.ghosh-1989.v1.c10.s2.3](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.reference.ghosh-1989.v1.c10.s2.3) · Pramāṇa