[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Studies](https://indike.org/pramana/ins) › [Reference works](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.reference) › [An Encyclopaedia of Indian Archaeology](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.reference.ghosh-1989) › v1.c14.s8.t2.17 # An Encyclopaedia of Indian Archaeology v1.c14.s8.t2.17 An Encyclopaedia of Indian Archaeology v1.c14.s8.t2.17 - **Language:** English ### [v1.c14.s8.t2.17](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.reference.ghosh-1989.v1.c14.s8.t2.17) 120000, 30000 and 6000. Another view is that the past levels of 2 and 6 m need not necessarily be due to eustatic changes and tectonic forces may have played a stronger role in the Early Quaternary period. - [Previous: v1.c14.s8.t2.16](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.reference.ghosh-1989.v1.c14.s8.t2.16) - [Next: v1.c14.s8.t2.18](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.reference.ghosh-1989.v1.c14.s8.t2.18) - [Up: v1.c14.s8.t2](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.reference.ghosh-1989.v1.c14.s8.t2) --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/ins.reference.ghosh-1989.v1.c14.s8.t2.17](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.reference.ghosh-1989.v1.c14.s8.t2.17) · Pramāṇa