[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Studies](https://indike.org/pramana/ins) › [Reference works](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.reference) › [An Encyclopaedia of Indian Archaeology](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.reference.ghosh-1989) › v1.c16.s23.3 # An Encyclopaedia of Indian Archaeology v1.c16.s23.3 An Encyclopaedia of Indian Archaeology v1.c16.s23.3 - **Language:** English ### [v1.c16.s23.3](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.reference.ghosh-1989.v1.c16.s23.3) The high degree of finish led archaeologists to consider it as an imported ware or at least an imitation of the Roman Samian Ware \[Subbarao, 1958, pp. 46-7, 137\], but the nuclear region of the ware, its quantity, the large number of its types with fundamental differences and a probable pre-Christian beginning tends to show its indigenous origin. - [Previous: v1.c16.s23.2](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.reference.ghosh-1989.v1.c16.s23.2) - [Next: v1.c16.s23.4](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.reference.ghosh-1989.v1.c16.s23.4) - [Up: v1.c16.s23](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.reference.ghosh-1989.v1.c16.s23) --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/ins.reference.ghosh-1989.v1.c16.s23.3](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.reference.ghosh-1989.v1.c16.s23.3) · Pramāṇa