<!-- Pramāṇa, a library of Indian primary sources · https://indike.org/pramana/ins.reference.ghosh-1989.v1.c19.s1.33 -->

[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Studies](https://indike.org/pramana/ins) › [Reference works](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.reference) › [An Encyclopaedia of Indian Archaeology](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.reference.ghosh-1989) › v1.c19.s1.33

# An Encyclopaedia of Indian Archaeology v1.c19.s1.33

An Encyclopaedia of Indian Archaeology v1.c19.s1.33

- **Language:** English

### [v1.c19.s1.33](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.reference.ghosh-1989.v1.c19.s1.33)

There is no firm evidence of any historical settlement before the same period in Assam \[except AMBARI\]. Incidentally, no proper Neolithic settlement has yet been reported from Assam, although there is no dearth of neoliths \[4.6.6\]. When the n.-e. hills, including Tripura, were opened up is anybody's guess but the process might have begun in the medieval period.

- [Previous: v1.c19.s1.32](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.reference.ghosh-1989.v1.c19.s1.32)
- [Next: v1.c19.s1.34](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.reference.ghosh-1989.v1.c19.s1.34)
- [Up: v1.c19.s1](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.reference.ghosh-1989.v1.c19.s1)

## Linked texts (1)

- [Ambari](https://indike.org/pramana/inp.site.ambari)

---
Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/ins.reference.ghosh-1989.v1.c19.s1.33](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.reference.ghosh-1989.v1.c19.s1.33) · Pramāṇa
