<!-- Pramāṇa, a library of Indian primary sources · https://indike.org/pramana/ins.reference.ghosh-1989.v1.c25.s4.26 -->

[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Studies](https://indike.org/pramana/ins) › [Reference works](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.reference) › [An Encyclopaedia of Indian Archaeology](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.reference.ghosh-1989) › v1.c25.s4.26

# An Encyclopaedia of Indian Archaeology v1.c25.s4.26

An Encyclopaedia of Indian Archaeology v1.c25.s4.26

- **Language:** English

### [v1.c25.s4.26](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.reference.ghosh-1989.v1.c25.s4.26)

The Semitic derivation of Brāhmī first suggested by Jones in 1806 has been subsequently supported by von Seentzen, Kopp, Lepsius, Weber, Bühler and recently by Dani.

- [Previous: v1.c25.s4.25](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.reference.ghosh-1989.v1.c25.s4.25)
- [Next: v1.c25.s4.27](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.reference.ghosh-1989.v1.c25.s4.27)
- [Up: v1.c25.s4](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.reference.ghosh-1989.v1.c25.s4)

---
Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/ins.reference.ghosh-1989.v1.c25.s4.26](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.reference.ghosh-1989.v1.c25.s4.26) · Pramāṇa
