[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Studies](https://indike.org/pramana/ins) › [Reference works](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.reference) › [An Encyclopaedia of Indian Archaeology](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.reference.ghosh-1989) › v1.c9.s6.25 # An Encyclopaedia of Indian Archaeology v1.c9.s6.25 An Encyclopaedia of Indian Archaeology v1.c9.s6.25 - **Language:** English ### [v1.c9.s6.25](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.reference.ghosh-1989.v1.c9.s6.25) (4) Domestication of animals \[1\]: Among the excavated Neolithic sites, animal remains have been examined from MASKI (Bhcla Nath, 1957), PIKLIHAL (Srinivasan, 1960), UTNUR (Srinivasan, 1961), T. NARSIPUR (Alur, 1971a), SANGANAKALLU (Alur, 1969, TEKKALAKOTTA (Nagaraja Rao, 1968). HALLUR (Alur, 1971a), KODEKAL (Shah, 1973), NAGARJUNA-KONDA (Gnanamuthu, 1958) and Kile Gul Mohammad (Fairservis, 1956). Of these the last-mentioned one falls in Pakistan and the remaining ones in the s. region. From the other regions the relevant evidence is not so far available. At ADAMGARH bones of domestic animals have been found in association with a microlithic industry. - [Previous: v1.c9.s6.24](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.reference.ghosh-1989.v1.c9.s6.24) - [Next: v1.c9.s6.26](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.reference.ghosh-1989.v1.c9.s6.26) - [Up: v1.c9.s6](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.reference.ghosh-1989.v1.c9.s6) --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/ins.reference.ghosh-1989.v1.c9.s6.25](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.reference.ghosh-1989.v1.c9.s6.25) · Pramāṇa