[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Studies](https://indike.org/pramana/ins) › [Reference works](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.reference) › [An Encyclopaedia of Indian Archaeology](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.reference.ghosh-1989) › v1.c9.s9.18 # An Encyclopaedia of Indian Archaeology v1.c9.s9.18 An Encyclopaedia of Indian Archaeology v1.c9.s9.18 - **Language:** English ### [v1.c9.s9.18](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.reference.ghosh-1989.v1.c9.s9.18) From the foregoing descriptions it would be seen that the s. rhomb of the so-called ‘Citadel’ did in fact contain structures of ritualistic denominations and as such it would be more appropriate to regard it as a religious or ‘temple’ complex rather than a ‘Citadel’ smacking of association with a king. Even in the n. rhomb there was no structure which could be regarded as a royal residence. In it there lay a series of houses on either side of a street, and it is not unlikely that in them there lived the priests whose duty it was to supervise the rituals performed in the s. rhomb. - [Previous: v1.c9.s9.17](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.reference.ghosh-1989.v1.c9.s9.17) - [Next: v1.c9.s9.19](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.reference.ghosh-1989.v1.c9.s9.19) - [Up: v1.c9.s9](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.reference.ghosh-1989.v1.c9.s9) --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/ins.reference.ghosh-1989.v1.c9.s9.18](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.reference.ghosh-1989.v1.c9.s9.18) · Pramāṇa