[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Studies](https://indike.org/pramana/ins) › [Reference works](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.reference) › [An Encyclopaedia of Indian Archaeology](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.reference.ghosh-1989) › v2.c39.221 # An Encyclopaedia of Indian Archaeology v2.c39.221 An Encyclopaedia of Indian Archaeology v2.c39.221 - **Language:** English ### [v2.c39.221](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.reference.ghosh-1989.v2.c39.221) It is surprising that Hunter completely ignored the stone circles and equally surprising is the fact that Rivett-Carnac who had reported 'the barrows' of adjacent JUNAPANI as early as 1879 did not take notice of the stone circles at Mahurjhari. Rivett-Carnac published a variety of iron objects at JUNAPANI comprising tools and weapons as also horse bits \[16.1\], brooches and buckles—essentially a Megalithic kit. In 1961-2 the ASI excavated a few stone circles at JANAPANI without reference to Mahurjhari (\*IAR 1961-2\*, p. 32). - [Previous: v2.c39.220](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.reference.ghosh-1989.v2.c39.220) - [Next: v2.c39.222](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.reference.ghosh-1989.v2.c39.222) - [Up: v2.c39](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.reference.ghosh-1989.v2.c39) --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/ins.reference.ghosh-1989.v2.c39.221](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.reference.ghosh-1989.v2.c39.221) · Pramāṇa