<!-- Pramāṇa, a library of Indian primary sources · https://indike.org/pramana/ins.reference.macdonell-keith-1912.v1.c2.13 -->

[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Studies](https://indike.org/pramana/ins) › [Reference works](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.reference) › [Vedic Index of Names and Subjects](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.reference.macdonell-keith-1912) › v1.c2.13

# Vedic Index of Names and Subjects v1.c2.13

Vedic Index of Names and Subjects v1.c2.13

- **Language:** English

### [v1.c2.13](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.reference.macdonell-keith-1912.v1.c2.13)

I have long had a rooted objection to crowding the letterpress of a book with parentheses containing a string of references or incidental explanations, because these distract the attention of the reader and interfere with his grasping the argument rapidly. I have accordingly in the present work (as in several previous ones) cleared the text of such obstructive matter, relegating references and minor explanations, illustrations, or discussions, to the notes. The sole exceptions are short references consisting of figures only, and occurring in articles of two or three lines in length. Thus, in the article ‘Kauṣārava’ (i. 194), the figures (viii. 28) are added in parentheses at the end of the line. To have made a footnote out of these figures alone would have been a pedantic and an absurd application of the general principle.

- [Previous: v1.c2.12](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.reference.macdonell-keith-1912.v1.c2.12)
- [Next: v1.c2.14](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.reference.macdonell-keith-1912.v1.c2.14)
- [Up: v1.c2](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.reference.macdonell-keith-1912.v1.c2)

---
Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/ins.reference.macdonell-keith-1912.v1.c2.13](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.reference.macdonell-keith-1912.v1.c2.13) · Pramāṇa
