<!-- Pramāṇa, a library of Indian primary sources · https://indike.org/pramana/ins.reference.macdonell-keith-1912.v1.c3.s17.261 -->

[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Studies](https://indike.org/pramana/ins) › [Reference works](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.reference) › [Vedic Index of Names and Subjects](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.reference.macdonell-keith-1912) › v1.c3.s17.261

# Vedic Index of Names and Subjects v1.c3.s17.261

Vedic Index of Names and Subjects v1.c3.s17.261

- **Language:** English

### [v1.c3.s17.261](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.reference.macdonell-keith-1912.v1.c3.s17.261)

⁶ For the recent controversy as to Iranian names found at Boghaz-kiöi, \*cf.\* Jacobi, \*Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society\*, 1909, 721 \*et seq.\*; Oldenberg, \*ibid.\*, 1095-1100; Keith, \*ibid.\*, 1100-1106; Sayce, \*ibid.\*, 1106, 1107; Kennedy, \*ibid.\*, 1107-1119. Hillebrandt, \*Vedische Mythologie\*, 1, 94 \*et seq.\*, argues in favour of an early connexion of Iranians and Indians in Arachosia, where he places part of the action of the Rigveda. Hopkins, \*Journal of the American Oriental Society\*, 17, 16, 277, holds that traces of Iranian connexion are signs of late date; Arnold, \*ibid.\*, 18, 205 \*et seq.\*, opposes this view.

- [Previous: v1.c3.s17.260](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.reference.macdonell-keith-1912.v1.c3.s17.260)
- [Next: v1.c3.s17.262](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.reference.macdonell-keith-1912.v1.c3.s17.262)
- [Up: v1.c3.s17](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.reference.macdonell-keith-1912.v1.c3.s17)

---
Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/ins.reference.macdonell-keith-1912.v1.c3.s17.261](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.reference.macdonell-keith-1912.v1.c3.s17.261) · Pramāṇa
