<!-- Pramāṇa, a library of Indian primary sources · https://indike.org/pramana/ins.reference.macdonell-keith-1912.v2.c4.s5.236 -->

[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Studies](https://indike.org/pramana/ins) › [Reference works](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.reference) › [Vedic Index of Names and Subjects](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.reference.macdonell-keith-1912) › v2.c4.s5.236

# Vedic Index of Names and Subjects v2.c4.s5.236

Vedic Index of Names and Subjects v2.c4.s5.236

- **Language:** English

### [v2.c4.s5.236](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.reference.macdonell-keith-1912.v2.c4.s5.236)

³⁶ See Keith, Journal of the African Society, 6, 202 et seq. The evidence, so far as it goes, of other Aryan peoples does not support the theory of original kingly ownership. Such ownership did not exist, as far as can be seen, in Anglo-Saxon times (English Historical Review, viii. 1-7), nor in Homeric Greece (Lang, Homer and His Age, 236 et seq.), nor at Rome.

- [Previous: v2.c4.s5.235](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.reference.macdonell-keith-1912.v2.c4.s5.235)
- [Next: v2.c4.s5.237](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.reference.macdonell-keith-1912.v2.c4.s5.237)
- [Up: v2.c4.s5](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.reference.macdonell-keith-1912.v2.c4.s5)

---
Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/ins.reference.macdonell-keith-1912.v2.c4.s5.236](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.reference.macdonell-keith-1912.v2.c4.s5.236) · Pramāṇa
