<!-- Pramāṇa, a library of Indian primary sources · https://indike.org/pramana/ins.reference.mani-1975.c9.5054 -->

[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Studies](https://indike.org/pramana/ins) › [Reference works](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.reference) › [Puranic Encyclopaedia: A Comprehensive Dictionary with Special Reference to the Epic and Puranic Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.reference.mani-1975) › c9.5054

# Puranic Encyclopaedia: A Comprehensive Dictionary with Special Reference to the Epic and Puranic Literature c9.5054

Purāṇic Encyclopaedia: A Comprehensive Dictionary with Special Reference to the Epic and Purāṇic Literature c9.5054

- **Language:** English

### [c9.5054](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.reference.mani-1975.c9.5054)

Whenever difference of opinion arises between two persons on any of the matter given above, the King should interfere and make a decision. For one reason or another, if the King could not attend the court, three learned Brahmins should enter the court and conduct the trial sitting or standing, and they should not conduct the trial walking to and fro. This was the practice of courts in ancient India.

- [Previous: c9.5053](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.reference.mani-1975.c9.5053)
- [Next: c9.5055](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.reference.mani-1975.c9.5055)
- [Up: c9](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.reference.mani-1975.c9)

---
Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/ins.reference.mani-1975.c9.5054](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.reference.mani-1975.c9.5054) · Pramāṇa
