<!-- Pramāṇa, a library of Indian primary sources · https://indike.org/pramana/ins.reference.yule-burnell-1886.c6.54 -->

[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Studies](https://indike.org/pramana/ins) › [Reference works](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.reference) › [Hobson-Jobson: A Glossary of Colloquial Anglo-Indian Words and Phrases, and of Kindred Terms, Etymological, Historical, Geographical and Discursive](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.reference.yule-burnell-1886) › c6.54

# Hobson-Jobson: A Glossary of Colloquial Anglo-Indian Words and Phrases, and of Kindred Terms, Etymological, Historical, Geographical and Discursive c6.54

Hobson-Jobson: A Glossary of Colloquial Anglo-Indian Words and Phrases, and of Kindred Terms, Etymological, Historical, Geographical and Discursive c6.54

- **Language:** English

### [c6.54](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.reference.yule-burnell-1886.c6.54)

My intention has been to give the headings of the articles under the most usual of the popular, or, if you will, vulgar quasi-English spellings, whilst the Oriental words, from which the headings are derived or corrupted, are set forth under precise transliteration, the system of which is given in a following "Nota Bene." When using the words and names in the course of discursive elucidation, I fear I have not been consistent in sticking either always to the popular or always to the scientific spelling, and I can the better understand why a German critic of a book of mine, once upon a time, remarked upon the \*etwas schwankende yulische Orthographie\*. Indeed it is difficult, it never will for me be possible, in a book for popular use, to adhere to one system in this matter without the assumption of an ill-fitting and repulsive pedantry. Even in regard to Indian proper names, in which I once advocated adhesion, with a small number of exceptions, to scientific precision in transliteration, I feel much more inclined than formerly to sympathise with my friends Sir William Muir and General Maclagan, who have always favoured a large and liberal recognition of popular spelling in such names. And when I see other good and able friends following the scientific Will-o'-the-Wisp into such bogs as the use in English composition of \*sipáhí\* and \*jangal\*, and \*verandah\*—nay, I have not only heard of \*bagí\*, but have recently seen it—instead of the good English words ‘sepoy,’ and ‘jungle,’ ‘veranda,’ and ‘buggy,’ my dread of pedantic usage becomes the greater.\*

- [Previous: c6.53](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.reference.yule-burnell-1886.c6.53)
- [Next: c6.55](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.reference.yule-burnell-1886.c6.55)
- [Up: c6](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.reference.yule-burnell-1886.c6)

---
Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/ins.reference.yule-burnell-1886.c6.54](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.reference.yule-burnell-1886.c6.54) · Pramāṇa
