<!-- Pramāṇa, a library of Indian primary sources · https://indike.org/pramana/ins.religion.oldenberg-1882.c8.4 -->

[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Studies](https://indike.org/pramana/ins) › [Religion and philosophy](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.religion) › [Buddha: His Life, his Doctrine, his Order](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.religion.oldenberg-1882) › c8.4

# Buddha: His Life, his Doctrine, his Order c8.4

Buddha: His Life, his Doctrine, his Order c8.4

- **Language:** English

### [c8.4](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.religion.oldenberg-1882.c8.4)

That ingenious student of Indian antiquity who has occupied himself most closely with this question, Emile Senart,† answers it with an absolute NO. A Buddha may have lived somewhere at some period, but that Buddha, of whom Buddhist tradition speaks, has never lived. This Buddha is not a man: his birth, the struggles he undergoes, and his death, are not those of a man.

- [Previous: c8.3](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.religion.oldenberg-1882.c8.3)
- [Next: c8.5](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.religion.oldenberg-1882.c8.5)
- [Up: c8](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.religion.oldenberg-1882.c8)

---
Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/ins.religion.oldenberg-1882.c8.4](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.religion.oldenberg-1882.c8.4) · Pramāṇa
