<!-- Pramāṇa, a library of Indian primary sources · https://indike.org/pramana/ins.religion.pande-1957.c19.s2.5 -->

[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Studies](https://indike.org/pramana/ins) › [Religion and philosophy](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.religion) › [Studies in the Origins of Buddhism](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.religion.pande-1957) › c19.s2.5

# Studies in the Origins of Buddhism c19.s2.5

Studies in the Origins of Buddhism c19.s2.5

- **Language:** English

### [c19.s2.5](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.religion.pande-1957.c19.s2.5)

inessential.¹⁴⁵ A kind of dualism appears to have sprung up between Samathabhāvanā and Vipassanā. As Buddhist dogmatics grew and Buddhists came to believe in theories and speculation with a zeal paralleled only by the Master's condemnation of them, intellectual understanding came to be regarded as the primary way to the knowledge of truth.¹⁴⁶ To Samatha was now attributed the purely negative function of suppressing (Nirodha) this or that element (Saṅkhāra).¹⁴⁷ This trend, however, did not go unchallenged. The Mādhyamikas relegated all theories to the realm of Saṃvṛti, stressing the utterly ineffable and non-intellectual nature of

- [Previous: c19.s2.4](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.religion.pande-1957.c19.s2.4)
- [Next: c19.s2.6](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.religion.pande-1957.c19.s2.6)
- [Up: c19.s2](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.religion.pande-1957.c19.s2)

---
Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/ins.religion.pande-1957.c19.s2.5](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.religion.pande-1957.c19.s2.5) · Pramāṇa
