[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Studies](https://indike.org/pramana/ins) › [Religion and philosophy](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.religion) › [The Encyclopedia of Indian Philosophies](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.religion.potter-1970) › v3.c19.s2 # The Encyclopedia of Indian Philosophies v3.c19.s2: Chapter Three The Encyclopedia of Indian Philosophies v3.c19.s2 - **Language:** English ### Chapter Three ### [v3.c19.s2.1](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.religion.potter-1970.v3.c19.s2.1) 1. See above, p. 30. 2. E.g., \*vidhi\*, \*codanā\*, \*niyoga\*. 3. See Mysore Hiriyanna, “The doctrine of niyoga,” in \*Indian Philosophical Studies II\* (Mysore : Kavyalaya, 1972), pp. 87-96. 4. An analysis that discovers twenty-six separate arguments in Sureśvara’s writing is C. Markandeya Sastri, \*Sureśvara’s Contribution to Advaita\* (Vemur: Sundari Samskrita Vidyalaya, 1973); see also V. P. Upadhyaya, B7113. 5. On \*kāma-pradhvaṃsa-vāda\* see M. Hiriyanna, B1045. 6. Cf. M. Hiriyanna, “Prapañca-vilayavāda—a doctrine of pre-Śaṃkara Vedānta” in \*Indian Philosophical Studies II\* (Mysore: Kavyalaya, 1972), pp. 28-35. 7. Hiriyanna, B1045. 8. This aspect of Śaṃkara’s thought is emphasized in papers by Ganeswar Misra in his \*Analytical Studies in Indian Philosophical Problems\* (Bhubaneshwar: Utkal University, 1971). 9. See Kunjunni Raja, B6510A, pp. 70-72. 10. Ibid., Chapter 3. 11. Cf. N. M. Sastri, B2126. \*Taittirīya Upaniṣad\* II.1.1—\*satyaṃ jñānam anantaṃ brahma\*—is frequently cited as a \*mahāvākya\*. Other authorities cite more—Sastri cites G. A. Jacob’s report that a work title \*Mahāvākyavivaraṇa\* recognizes twelve great sentences. ## Linked texts (1) - [Taittirīyopaniṣad](https://indike.org/pramana/in.veda.upanisad.mukhya.taittiriya.2.1.1) — Sanskrit --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/ins.religion.potter-1970.v3.c19.s2](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.religion.potter-1970.v3.c19.s2) · Pramāṇa