<!-- Pramāṇa, a library of Indian primary sources · https://indike.org/pramana/ins.science.datta-1932.c18.42 -->

[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Studies](https://indike.org/pramana/ins) › [Science, technology and education](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.science) › [The Science of the Shulba: A Study in Early Hindu Geometry](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.science.datta-1932) › c18.42

# The Science of the Shulba: A Study in Early Hindu Geometry c18.42

The Science of the Śulba: A Study in Early Hindu Geometry c18.42

- **Language:** English

### [c18.42](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.science.datta-1932.c18.42)

¹ It should be noted that the result (4) does not follow, quite contrary to expectations, from the equation (2), on the substitution in the latter of the value, m=94. $x² = 1+(4× 94)/29 = 13 28/29 = 14, approximately.$ This is too less than the value (5) recorded by Kātyāyana. That is why we started by substituting m=94 in the equation (1). This shows that the process of calculation has much to account for.

- [Previous: c18.41](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.science.datta-1932.c18.41)
- [Next: c18.43](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.science.datta-1932.c18.43)
- [Up: c18](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.science.datta-1932.c18)

---
Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/ins.science.datta-1932.c18.42](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.science.datta-1932.c18.42) · Pramāṇa
