<!-- Pramāṇa, a library of Indian primary sources · https://indike.org/pramana/ins.science.keay-1918.c5.31 -->

[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Studies](https://indike.org/pramana/ins) › [Science, technology and education](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.science) › [Ancient Indian Education: An Inquiry into its Origin, Development, and Ideals](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.science.keay-1918) › c5.31

# Ancient Indian Education: An Inquiry into its Origin, Development, and Ideals c5.31

Ancient Indian Education: An Inquiry into its Origin, Development, and Ideals c5.31

- **Language:** English

### [c5.31](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.science.keay-1918.c5.31)

‘Discipline,’ he says, ‘is of two kinds: artificial and natural; for instruction can render only a docile being conformable to the rules of discipline, and not an undocile being. The study of sciences can tame only those who are possessed of such mental faculties as obedience, hearing, grasping, retentive memory, discrimination, inference, and deliberation, but not others devoid of such faculties.’ By natural discipline he means, it would seem, the discipline which arises from the docility of the pupil; for those who have not this there is the artificial discipline of punishment.

- [Previous: c5.30](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.science.keay-1918.c5.30)
- [Next: c5.32](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.science.keay-1918.c5.32)
- [Up: c5](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.science.keay-1918.c5)

---
Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/ins.science.keay-1918.c5.31](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.science.keay-1918.c5.31) · Pramāṇa
