[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Studies](https://indike.org/pramana/ins) › [Science, technology and education](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.science) › [Vada in Theory and Practice: Studies in Debates, Dialogues and Discussions in Indian Intellectual Discourses](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.science.tripathi-2021) › c11.s3.4 # Vada in Theory and Practice: Studies in Debates, Dialogues and Discussions in Indian Intellectual Discourses c11.s3.4 Vāda in Theory and Practice: Studies in Debates, Dialogues and Discussions in Indian Intellectual Discourses c11.s3.4 - **Language:** English ### [c11.s3.4](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.science.tripathi-2021.c11.s3.4) Anti-\*satī\* movement was already getting momentum. when Rammohun Roy took up its cause. In fact, before Roy brought out his first tract against the practice of \*satī\* in 1818, Mrityunjaya Vidyalankar had already recorded his views on \*satī\* in his official capacity as a \*paṇḍit\* in the Supreme Court. He had “anticipated most of the arguments later advanced by Raja Rammohun Roy”.²⁸ - [Previous: c11.s3.3](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.science.tripathi-2021.c11.s3.3) - [Next: c11.s3.5](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.science.tripathi-2021.c11.s3.5) - [Up: c11.s3](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.science.tripathi-2021.c11.s3) --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/ins.science.tripathi-2021.c11.s3.4](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.science.tripathi-2021.c11.s3.4) · Pramāṇa