[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Studies](https://indike.org/pramana/ins) › [Science, technology and education](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.science) › [Vada in Theory and Practice: Studies in Debates, Dialogues and Discussions in Indian Intellectual Discourses](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.science.tripathi-2021) › c11.s6.2 # Vada in Theory and Practice: Studies in Debates, Dialogues and Discussions in Indian Intellectual Discourses c11.s6.2 Vāda in Theory and Practice: Studies in Debates, Dialogues and Discussions in Indian Intellectual Discourses c11.s6.2 - **Language:** English ### [c11.s6.2](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.science.tripathi-2021.c11.s6.2) Theological and sectarian debates assumed bitterness during this period. In \*Radde-Hanūd\* Mohammad Ismail Bokani criticized Hindu ways of life which was published from Mumbai in 1845. More editions of the work from several places were issued. Badridas Chaube wrote \*Radde-Musalman\* in reply. Maulana Ubedullah wrote \*Tohaful-Hind\* (Gift of India) in Urdu. Indra Mani gave a reply to it in his \*Tohaful-Islam\*. This series in the form of attacks and counter-attacks continued.⁵⁴ \*Satyārthaprakāśa\* of Swami Dayananda also became a precursor to such debates. There were texts on unscientific nature of various religious sects. Bachcharaj Singhi wrote \*Jaina Śāstroṅ kī Asaṅgat Bāteṅ\* (Inconsistencies in Jaina \*Śāstras\*).⁵⁵ - [Previous: c11.s6.1](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.science.tripathi-2021.c11.s6.1) - [Next: c11.s7.1](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.science.tripathi-2021.c11.s7.1) - [Up: c11.s6](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.science.tripathi-2021.c11.s6) --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/ins.science.tripathi-2021.c11.s6.2](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.science.tripathi-2021.c11.s6.2) · Pramāṇa