<!-- Pramāṇa, a library of Indian primary sources · https://indike.org/pramana/ins.science.tripathi-2021.c8.s5.32 -->

[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Studies](https://indike.org/pramana/ins) › [Science, technology and education](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.science) › [Vada in Theory and Practice: Studies in Debates, Dialogues and Discussions in Indian Intellectual Discourses](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.science.tripathi-2021) › c8.s5.32

# Vada in Theory and Practice: Studies in Debates, Dialogues and Discussions in Indian Intellectual Discourses c8.s5.32

Vāda in Theory and Practice: Studies in Debates, Dialogues and Discussions in Indian Intellectual Discourses c8.s5.32

- **Language:** English

### [c8.s5.32](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.science.tripathi-2021.c8.s5.32)

The Pariṇāmavāda of the Sāṁkhya stands in sharp contrast to both the theories — Ārabhyārambhakavāda (transitive causation) and Ārambhavāda (intransitive causation) and also to the Vivartavāda of the Advaita Vedāntin. It views the physical world as a transformation of one single, unitary and all-pervasive substance, named as \*prakṛti\* (primordial matter). The universe is evolved out of this \*prakṛti\*. The Naiyāyikas like Udayana criticize the Sāṁkhya, questioning the possibility of diversity evolving out of singularity. They also point out the inner contradiction of \*prakṛti\* being \*acetana\* (insentient) but having the power of creation.

- [Previous: c8.s5.31](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.science.tripathi-2021.c8.s5.31)
- [Next: c8.s5.33](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.science.tripathi-2021.c8.s5.33)
- [Up: c8.s5](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.science.tripathi-2021.c8.s5)

---
Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/ins.science.tripathi-2021.c8.s5.32](https://indike.org/pramana/ins.science.tripathi-2021.c8.s5.32) · Pramāṇa
