Shringaraprakasha 10.p1.13

10.p1.13

370: Demonstration of the possibility of necessity regarding non-intention and intention respectively in examples of numbers belonging to the subject of an injunction (uddeśya) and the provision of an injunction (upādeya). 371–73: Demonstration of the agreement of grammarians with the settled view of the Mīmāṃsakas. Explanation of the non-intention of number even in an accessory in certain cases. Demonstration of the connection of being a syntactic role, which is the meaning of a case ending, with number, which is the meaning of a case ending. 374–75: The case ending's denoting the qualifying conditions of power, number, and relation abiding in the entity expressed by the nominal stem. Doubt regarding the non-existence of a power distinct from the essential nature. 376: Strengthening of the objection regarding the dispensability of supersensible power, preceded by the refutation of the doubt that power is indispensable. 377: Exposition of the existence of a power distinct from the essential nature. 378–79: Explanation of the kinds of complex formation (vṛtti) based on the distinction of non-word-meanings and so forth. 380: Investigation into the meaning of 'complex formation is the expression of another's meaning'. 381: Proposal that the subordinate element assists the principal element. 382: Explanation of the nature of complex formation in 'rājapuruṣa' (king's servant). 383–84: The aggregate's consisting of parts. The division of number being based on the division of parts. 385–89: Statement of Jaimini's view that the universal alone is the meaning of a word. Refutation of the individual and configuration being denoted by words. 390–92: Restatement of the view of the followers of Vyāḍi who advocate the denotative power for the individual. Exposure of the impossibility of a definition of the individual. Pointing out faults in the doctrine that the universal is the denotative meaning. 393–95: The secondary indication of the individual by the universal and configuration, even though they are not the primary meaning of the word. Refutation of the objection that every meaning would follow if the individual were the meaning of the word. Summary of denotation of the individual. 396: Unveiling of the intent of the textual tradition of Vindhyavāsin who argues that configuration is the word-meaning, along with reasons. 397–98: Statement that even formless entities such as qualities are auxiliaries to action. Demonstration that words denote an individual qualified by a universal. 399–402: Explanation of the undesired consequence of assuming restriction if the verbal operation conveyed merely the pure universal. Agreement of Akṣapāda with the view that words denote an individual qualified by a universal.