Shringaraprakasha 10.p1.21

10.p1.21

The doubt that syntactic expectancy too, like spatial proximity, may be caused by invariable concomitance, and its resolution. 633–38: Conclusion on not resorting to invariable concomitance as the cause in syntactic expectancy. The utility of sequence in the expression of the syntactically connected. The twofold nature of semantic fitness. The threefold nature of primary meaning based on universal, bodily form, and mistaken apprehension, with examples. The threefold nature of secondary meaning based on the divisions of figurative, transferred, and indicative, with examples. 639–43: The establishment of substances as non-indicative when there is syntactic connection with an action through the mediation of substance between quality and action. The doubt regarding the impossibility of expressing the syntactically connected in sentences like "He who desires heaven should sacrifice" because semantic fitness is not ascertained, and its refutation. Definition of semantic compatibility. The threefold nature of semantic compatibility in the forms of difference, association, and both, with examples. The threefold nature of connection consisting of mutual expectancy and mutual interpenetration. 644–46: Their examples in respective order. Description of the diverse meanings of the word "connection" through alternative interpretations, with examples. The condition of principal and subordinate depending, according to the composition, on linguistic expression or non-verbal supply. 647–48: In the doctrine of the expression of the syntactically connected, consideration of the validity of merely recalling the intrinsic form; demonstration of syntactic connection only with fixed meanings in the very doctrine of the expression of the syntactically connected. 649–51: Demonstration that words do not denote unconnected meanings; examination and discussion of parsimony versus prolixity in postulating word-potencies in the views of the doctrine of the expression of the syntactically connected and the doctrine of the connection of the expressed; discussion of words denoting meaning in combination. 652–54: Objection and resolution regarding the uselessness of syntactic expectancy and the like in the doctrine of the expression of the syntactically connected; defense of the doctrine of the expression of the syntactically connected as alone reasonable; presentation of the view of the proponent of the connection of the expressed. 655: Linguistic sound as an inferential mark of the capacity to deposit a potency residing in word-meanings. 656–58: The doubt that the apprehension of syntactic connection is not included among the means of knowledge when there is apprehension of word-meaning without it, and its resolution. The assertion that the sentence-meaning is just the word-meanings possessing syntactic expectancy and other factors, and its refutation.