Shringaraprakasha 10.p1.7

10.p1.7

188–89: Examples of adverbials and so forth. Determination of the nature of purpose. 190–92: The nature of an indication also as a specific kind of cause, like purpose. The status of a cause also as an indication in certain cases. The nature of a sentence, and the statement of the threefold division of sentences with examples. 193–97: The twofold division of everyday language into poetry and treatise, with examples. The threefold division of Prakrit with examples. The twofold divisions of indicative and double-entendre expressions, with examples. The threefold division of Apabhraṃśa. 198–200: Examples of Sāṭī and others. Statement of the elevenfold nature of the sentence. Examples of the eight kinds, such as multiple, repeated, and non-repeated finite verbs. 203–4: Examples and discussions of the eight kinds, such as inverted finite verbs. Inquiry into the acceptance or non-acceptance of unbroken series of finite verbs. 205: The view of certain scholars on this very point. 206: The objection and resolution regarding whether the relation of modifier and modified has distinct, non-distinct, or both referents. 207: Prefixes functioning as adverbials. 208: Inadmissibility of the relation of modifier and modified between two inflected verbs having different syntactic loci. 209–10: Inadmissibility of the connection [of one action] with another action when an action whose single nature is being brought into being acts as the agent; presentation of the relation of ends and means between two actions. 211: The mutual connection and disconnection of two finite verbs. 212: Refutation of the objection regarding the presence of a connection between two finite verbs due to sentence-split and the like. 213: A particle having the form of a finite verb because it expresses an address in the context of jest. 214: Objection regarding the unwanted consequence of plurality for the word 'eka' expressing number in a jest concerning many, and its refutation. 215: Absence of connection between two finite verbs according to Kātyāyana. 216: Acceptance of connection between two finite verbs according to the Sūtrakāra. 217–18: An address modifying an action. Disclosure of the intention of the Sūtrakāra and Vārttikakāra on this matter. 219: Statement of the possibility that an action too can be a syntactic role. 220: A word having more meaning than what constitutes a sentence. 221: Exposition of the doctrine of those who assert that cognition, by virtue of differences in form, is of the nature of action.