Rasarnavasudhakara 2.420

[Causeless pique] of the woman is as [in]:
"Relinquish your anger, O woman of innocent eyes!
I bowed to the twilight goddess, not to any other woman.
Do you not know that your lifelong partner
has conduct like that of the cakravāka?"

|| (Kumārasambhava 8.57)

Here, the cause of Pārvatī's pique—the Supreme Lord's salutation to twilight—is a semblance [of a cause].

Now, it might be objected: in the verse beginning 'aliapasutta', there is no prohibition against kissing the cheek. Likewise, in the verse beginning 'muñca kopam', no prohibition is heard. So how can this causeless state be pique, even in the absence of a prohibition such as 'don't' or 'no'? If this is asked, [the answer is:] because a verbal prohibition such as 'don't' or 'no' is an indirect indication; in the previous example beginning 'aliapasutta', a prohibition characterized by the non-acceptance of a kiss is indeed present through lack of reciprocation. In the other [example] beginning 'muñca kopam', on the other hand, a prohibition characterized by refusal is indeed to be stated through not giving a reply and the like.

Now, if it is asked: what is the difference between causeless pique and pique in the form of crookedness of emotional disposition? It is answered: in causeless pique, however, the result is the testing of love by delaying kissing and the like under the pretext of anger. In pique that is crookedness of emotional disposition, on the other hand, the result is the absence of delay in kissing and the like. Thus the distinction between the two is quite clear.