དན་རྣམ་པར་ངས་པ་ཞས་བྱ་བའ་ཆས་ཀྱ་རྣམ་གྲངས notes.111

notes.111

111. Here the Sanskrit does not have anything explicitly matching pus mo (“knee,” often representing jānu). Samtani notices that there is a textual problem and supports his preferred reading with the Nibandhana commentary and with the relevant Mahāvyutpatti entry (Samtani 1971, p. 54, n. 7). It is to be noted that the relevant Mahāvyutpatti entry also has pus mo in the Tibetan but nothing explicitly matching it in the Sanskrit; we thus think that the Tibetan was in fact meant to translate the Sanskrit without jānu, but was meant to make it more explicit.