འཕགས་པ་ངན་འགྲ་ཐམས་ཅད་ཡངས་ས་སྦྱང་བ་གཙག་ཏར་རྣམ་པར་རྒྱལ་བ་ཞས་བྱ་བའ་གཟངས notes.37

notes.37

37. At this point in most versions of the dhāraṇī comes the phrase samantān mocaya mocaya which, while it is absent here in the Degé text of Toh 597, the version of this work in the Action Tantra section, is present in Toh 984, the supposedly duplicate reiteration in the Dhāraṇī section, as well as in the Stok Palace Kangyur, and in the Sanskrit manuscripts according to Hidas’ edition; in the Narthang and Lhasa Kangyurs it reads samantā mocaya mocaya. The phrase (in one or other of these two spellings) is also present in all other canonical versions of the dhāraṇī in this group of texts—with the exception of the heavily abridged version in the Phukdrak Kangyur (see ). See also ; one could speculate that this phrase might possibly have been displaced at some point by a scribal error. The phrase here samantān mocaya mocaya is absent at this point in the Degé text of Toh 597 in the Action Tantra section, despite this version, Toh 984, being its supposedly duplicate reiteration. The same phrase is also present in the Stok Palace Kangyur, and in the Sanskrit manuscripts according to Hidas’ edition; in the Narthang and Lhasa Kangyurs it reads samantā mocaya mocaya. In one or other of these two spellings it is also present in all other canonical versions of the dhāraṇī in this group of texts—with the exception of the heavily abridged version in the Phukdrak Kangyur (see ). See also ; one could speculate that this phrase might possibly have been displaced at some point by a scribal error.