金剛般若經贊述 1.122

1.122

釋者論說六波羅蜜有二種果，一者、未來，二者、現在，如論具顯。云「不住於事」，此說不著檀波羅蜜未來果；「應無所住」者，此不著餘五度未來果也；若求現在果故行施，名為「住色、聲」等行施也；若求現法涅槃故行施者，名為「住法」行施也。子云，准此故知，「應無所住」者，脫一法字也。理應云，「無所住法，行於布施」故。餘見論文，自當決了。

The commentator's treatise says that the six pāramitās have two kinds of fruits: first, future; second, present, as fully revealed in the treatise. Saying "not abiding in things" means not being attached to the future fruit of the dānapāramitā; "should not abide in anything" means not being attached to the future fruits of the other five pāramitās. If one practices giving because of seeking present fruits, it is called practicing giving while "abiding in form, sound," and so forth; if one practices giving because of seeking present-life nirvāṇa, it is called practicing giving while "abiding in dharmas." I remark: based on this, one knows that in "should not abide in anything," the character "dharma" (fa) has been omitted. In principle, it should say, "without abiding in any dharmas, practice dāna." For the rest, see the text of the treatise, and it will naturally be resolved.