金剛般若經贊述 2.234

2.234

謂有疑曰：「若如來不得一法，名無上正等正覺者，云何離於上上證轉轉得阿耨多羅三藐三菩提耶？」就此文中有二，初、善現問，次、如來即廣辨其義，此初也。「為無所得耶」者，謂耶是問詞，不是不定詞也。直問佛云，如來無所得耶？所以佛即印之。若不定為問云為得不得耶者，佛如何即印耶？故今問意云，真如理中佛得無上菩提不？

That is to say, there is a doubt: "If the Tathāgata does not attain a single dharma, which is called unexcelled, complete, and perfect awakening, then how, apart from ever-higher realisations, does one progressively attain anuttarā samyaksaṃbodhi?" In this passage there are two parts: first, Subhūti asks, and next, the Tathāgata broadly analyses its meaning. This is the first. "Was it with nothing attained?" Here, ye is an interrogative particle, not a particle of uncertainty. He directly asks the Buddha: "Did the Tathāgata have nothing attained?" Therefore, the Buddha immediately confirms it. If he had asked an indeterminate question, saying "did you attain or not attain?", how could the Buddha immediately confirm it? Hence the intention of the question now is: in the principle of tathatā, does the Buddha attain unexcelled bodhi or not?