金剛般若經贊述 2.250

2.250

述曰，世親云，自下破第二子段疑。謂有疑曰：「若一切善法滿足得菩提者，則所說法不能得大菩提。何以故？以所說法，無記法故。」謂此意云，其能詮教有名、句、文，體是無記，如何聽聞而生善耶？此是小乘人疑也。就破此疑中，初、舉功德，次、以受、持校量，此初也。

The Commentary says: Vasubandhu states that from here on, the doubt of the second subdivision is refuted. That is, there is a doubt that says: 'If it is by fulfilling all wholesome dharmas that bodhi is attained, then the spoken teaching cannot attain great bodhi. Why is this? Because the spoken teaching consists of indeterminate dharmas (avyākṛta).' The meaning of this is: the expressive teaching has names, sentences, and phonemes, and its nature is indeterminate; how could listening to it generate what is wholesome? This is a doubt raised by followers of the Hīnayāna. Within refuting this doubt, first, merit is cited; next, it is comparatively measured against receiving and upholding. This is the first [part].