金剛般若經疏論纂要 1.71

1.71

Previously it pointed only to three matters; now both mind and object, emptiness and existence, are completely dispelled down to the finest subtleness. Therefore the verse says: 'Far removed from the mind that grasps at marks.' The treatise says: 'Not seeing the given object, the recipient, or the giver.' Asaṅga says: 'Not abiding in the perception of marks.' Some people take this concluding text as answering the question on subduing [the mind], which is incorrect. The preceding statement, the following explanation, and the subsequent conclusion all speak of 'non-abiding', all of which are the meaning of subduing within practice; why suddenly assign this concluding passage exclusively to answer a different question?