金剛經纂要刊定記 2.62

2.62

不如等者，若知真身是實、應身是虛，又了相即無相名為真身，無相即相名為應身，如是見者名如實見。故《華嚴》云：「於實見真實，不實見不實。如是解法相，是則名為佛。」若不如是，名為不如實見。

As for "not as it truly is" and so forth: If one knows that the true body is real and the responsive body is illusory, and further understands that marks are themselves without marks—which is termed the true body—and that being without marks is itself marks—which is termed the responsive body—to see thus is called "seeing as it truly is." Therefore the *Avataṃsaka* says: "Seeing reality in the real, / and seeing unreality in the unreal: / one who understands the characteristics of phenomena thus / is called a Buddha." If it is not thus, it is called "not seeing as it truly is."